There are many things we observe in history that we wouldn’t necessarily want to appropriate into the present.

The church is not a biological, chemical, or mechanical laboratory. We’re not looking for the latest developments in “Christian theology.” Our science is very old.

When we say “Scripture interprets Scripture,” we are talking about the analogy of Scripture.

We should be careful not to insert ourselves, or what we do into the gospel equation. If we do this, we essentially become co-mediators and co-redeemers with Christ.

It’s a microcosm of the overall redemptive arc of our Lord’s incarnate ministry. From Capernaum, through the trial of storm, landing in the nether regions on the other side of Galilee (and Jordan).

According to Thomas Aquinas, the Augustinian definition “comprises perfectly the whole essential notion of virtue.”

But paedobaptists generally limited covenant interest only to immediate offspring.

When we speak of theology as “theoretical” we are not speaking about something uncertain or non-factual.

Very few people speak to one another. Knecks angled down, eyes overshadowed by hair or brow, most people stare at their phones.

Sola Scriptura and biblicism are entirely different from one another in form and matter. Sola Scriptura is a principle, biblicism is a mode or manner of biblical interaction.